Jump to content

Search the Community

Showing results for tags 'automobile'.



More search options

  • Search By Tags

    Type tags separated by commas.
  • Search By Author

Content Type


Forums

  • Car and Automotive Discussion
    • Car Comparisons & Shopping
    • American Manufacturers
    • Asian Manufacturers
    • European Manufacturers
    • Car Racing
    • After Market Parts and Electronics
    • Repairs & Maintenance
    • General Car Discussion
  • General Discussion
    • Off Topic
    • Gossip and News from the Industry
    • Introducing our Members
    • Site Related Discussion and News
  • Classifieds
    • Private: For Sale
    • Vendor: For Sale
    • Announcements

Find results in...

Find results that contain...


Date Created

  • Start

    End


Last Updated

  • Start

    End


Filter by number of...

Joined

  • Start

    End


Group


AIM


MSN


Website URL


ICQ


Yahoo


Jabber


Skype


Location


Interests


Year


Model

Found 18 results

  1. The Nissan Terra vs Isuzu Mu-X are all based on pick-up trucks and excellent SUVs. To compare two models, let’s find out full details in the Nissan Terra vs Isuzu Mu-X comparison! In terms of exterior, both of these items have this rugged and tough look. However, the Nissan Terra 2019 is a little bit larger than the Mu-X. Consequently, the Terra will have a bigger boot space than the Mu-X and the interior space will be much larger. Also, the Terra has a longer wheelbase and a higher ground clearance for a much more comfortable ride. When it comes to interiors, the Terra offers more spacious room in its second and third row. Both SUVs come furnished with leather seats; the dashboard and their center consoles are adorned by silver accents. The top of the line Isuzu MU-X has a larger touchscreen display at 8 inches compared to the Terra’s 7 inch unit. The one on the Terra despite being smaller is more advanced with Apple CarPlay, Android Auto, Wifi, GPS navigation, and video playback. A s regards safety features, the Terra plainly beats the Mu-X. To be specific, all variants for the Nissan Terra have six airbags while the Mu-x’s top of the line only gets two on the front. For other safety equipment, both the top variants of the Terra and the Mu-X both come with electronic brake distribution, anti-lock braking system, and so on. Under the hood, the Isuzu Mu-x has three engine options and two options for its power train. Meanwhile, the Nissan Terra only has one engine option. Additionally, the Nissan Terra has a whopping 80 liters of fuel capacity and there are also 4x4 and 4x2 variants. To sum up, it’s up to you while considering two items. Let’s go with Nissan Terra vs Isuzu Mu-X!
  2. Should you need to see a very aggressive item, here comes the Nissan GT-R vs the Ford Mustang comparison which will of some help to car customers. Now let’s check out which one is the better of two performance cars. In terms of exterior, the GT-R is vastly different than the Mustang. The Nissan GT-R is a modern marvel of engineering while the model Ford Mustang is a powerful nod to the classic muscle cars of the 60’s. Furthermore, the GT-R possesses a sense of a monster track car and the Mustang, while also capable on the track, draws more on the nostalgia of the muscle car scene. As regards interior and convenience, there are some main differences. Specifically, the Nissan GT-R has a smaller boot space than the Mustang despite its shorter length. Yet both of these vehicles have limited room for rear passengers. Two models all have interior features in common, such as cruise control, leather upholstery, Dual Zone Automatic Climate Control and Steering Wheel Audio Control. However, the GT-R seems superior when sporting more features in entertainment system, together with Voice Recognition. Meanwhile, the Mustang acquires 12 speakers inside. About performance, the GT-R, even the lower variant, is much more powerful than the Mustang 5.0. While the Ford Mustang has more cylinders and a larger displacement, the GT-R NISMO’s twin-turbo V6 makes 608 horsepower. In addition, the GT-R NISMO is an insanely advanced and almost perfect all-wheel-drive system that uses two driveshafts and a series of electronic sensors and hydraulically actuated clutches. So to make it clearer in fuller information, go for Nissan GT-R vs Ford Mustang comparison right in Philkotse if you take interest!
  3. Which deserve our choice between a conservatively styled or a macho and modern MPV? Here comes the comparison between Ertiga vs Xpander to understand both two models in the automotive market. As regards size, the Mitsubishi Xpander 2019 is a bit wider and higher thanks to its larger 16-inch wheels, offering a larger maximum cargo volume at 1,632 liters when the rears fold down. Meanwhile, the Ertiga gets a decent 803 liters if the third row. When it comes to looks, the Xpander sports a very futuristic, edgy, macho look while the Ertiga owns a more elegant and sedate vibe. In terms of interior, the Mitsubishi Xpander’s elegant dashboard features the essential within easy reach. The 7-inch LCD screen on the center comes with AM/FM radio, MP3, AUX, and so on. The Xpander also has fabric all around and offers generous legroom and headroom. In comparison, the Suzuki Ertiga has a beige looking interior with comfortable seats as well as spacious knee room and headroom for the third and second row. Inside the Ertiga, the large 10-inch touchscreen provides better visibility. Both the Xpander and the Ertiga have only one engine option. For the Xpander, there’s the 1.5 L 4A91 Mivec Inline-4 gasoline engine producing 103 horsepoander GLwer and 141 nm of torque. As for the Suzuki Ertiga 2019, it gets the 1.5-liter K15B Inline-4 engine. Both two have the same transmission choices, a 5-speed manual or a 4-speed automatic. As to safety equipment, the Ertiga GLX and the XpS Sport scores equally since both vehicles have ISOFIX tethers for child seating, rear parking sensors, dual front airbags, anti-lock braking systems, and electronic brake distribution. For better understanding and comparison in detail, come to Suzuki Ertiga vs Mitsubishi Xpander available on the Philkotse!
  4. The local mid-size pickup truck scene has been dominated by these 2 behemoths: Hilux vs Strada. Can you guess which one is better? In terms of exterior, the 2020 Mitsubishi Strada GT and the Toyota Hilux Conquest are well-designed, carrying a bold presence with their hefty dimensions. The Strada looks stunning with smaller LED headlamps and larger flood lamps. The bed also leads its class in total length, optimizing loading capability and interior space. Meanwhile, the Toyota Hilux also features LED fog lamps and headlamps as well as Daylight Running lamps. You can also find a sports bar mounted on the rear bed for all off-roading capable vehicles. As regards interior, the Mitsubishi Strada GT and the Toyota Hilux Conquest offer proper amenities for occupants to both enjoy and marvel at. The Toyota Hilux Conquest’s interior sports logically placed buttons and switches, together with the leather-wrapped steering wheel and some soft-touch plastics on the door trims. On the other hand, the Mitsubishi Strada GT features a full leather interior seats, which instantly makes it a tad better already than the Hilux Conquest. Both of these trucks are powered by the most advanced diesel engines available in the Philippines. The Toyota Hilux 2019 produces 177hp at 3400 RPM and a spine bashing 450 Nm of torque. Mitsubishi, powered by a smaller displacement 4N15 MIVEC Diesel engine, generates 181 hp at 3500 RPM and 430 Nm of torque at 2500 RPM from a smaller 2.4-liter engine. To ensure full criteria along with price and safety features for proper estimation, move on to Toyota Hilux vs Strada 2020 comparison on the Philkotse.com for more news!
  5. Have you ever considered between Nissan Terra vs Montero Sport? Though the Nissan Terra is relatively new to the Philippine mid-size SUV segment, it still stands out while the Mitsubishi Montero Sport is rising to fame. Now let’s find out which one is worth selecting! Based on figures, the Nissan Terra is significantly larger in almost all categories, which is 100 mm longer, 50 mm wider and has 30 mm more height, a longer wheelbase by around 50 mm as well as a higher ground clearance. Nonetheless, the smaller Montero Sport is actually considered as one of the best handling mid-size SUVs. With its generous ground clearance, Nissan Terra is a winner in terms of off-roading capabilities. In short, if you have to pass through rough and sketchy roads on a regular basis, go for the Terra. Otherwise, choose the Mitsubishi Montero Sport for paved roads. As for looks, that’s up to you. The Terra is brusque and utilitarian, and tough-looking while the new Montero Sport GT is futuristic and elegant. By and large, the two top of the line variants sports the same amount of interior features. The Nissan Terra 2019 though has a larger touchscreen that comes with Apple CarPlay and Android auto whereas the Montero Sport has a smaller 6.7-inch unit. Especially, the Montero Sport GT comes with a sunroof. In terms of safety, both of these models have curtain airbags, side airbags, and dual front airbags. The Mitsubishi Montero Sport 2019 surpasses the Nissan Terra with respect to a Knee airbag. Two models are equipped with other features such as an anti-lock braking system with EBD, stability control, and locking differentials. To sum up, the Nissan Terra and the Mitsubishi Montero Sport have their own appeal. For fully listed comparison, come to Nissan Terra vs Montero Sport on our site!
  6. As you might know, the Honda BR-V and the Honda Mobilio share a platform as well as an H brand. So what makes them distinguish each other? Let's find out in-depth differences between the crossover SUV and the mini MPV, Honda BR-V vs Mobilio! Since the Honda BR-V is larger, the luggage storage space is definitely larger at 691 liters if the third row is folded, compared to the Mobilio’s 521 literseven. The BR-V 1.5 V has a larger set of tires at 16 inches in comparison to the Mobilio’s 15-inch set. What’s more, the BR-V owns a higher ground clearance for better driving on uneven terrains in comparison with the Mobilio. Another plus of the Honda BR-V is that legroom, and headroom inside the model is distinctly more generous. As to comfort, both vehicles’ third-row seating can be a little tight, especially for adults. They share a lot of characteristics including design, some parts of chassis and engines. Under the hood, the Mobilio and the BR-V both come with the L15Z1 i-VTEC inline-four gasoline engine, making 120hp and 145Nm of torque. Two models also have front-wheel drive. When it comes to safety, both the Mobilio 1.5 RS Navi and the BR-V 1.5 V CVT have the same amount of features. Both come packed with dual front airbags, the anti-lock braking system with electronic brake-force distribution, security alarms, engine immobilizer, stability control, ISOFIX, and rear parking sensors. For additional information about the two models’ specifications and price, check out the Honda BR-V vs Honda Mobilio comparison on Philkotse!
  7. If you are wondering which is the better of the two most popular compact sedan models, here comes the comparison between Honda Civic and Mazda 3 for people to reach rational decisions. First of all, the Civic RS Turbo has the more superior dimensions over the Mazda 3, specifically wider by 4 mm, but the Mazda has a 25 mm longer wheelbase that's 25 mm longer. In terms of styling, the Mazda 3 acquires fluid and elegant design as well as a premium-looking exterior. Meanwhile, the Civic RS Turbo now has a more grown-up appearance, sporting a couple of faux air vents. As to interior, the Mazda 3 and the Civic RS are both well-equipped. In terms of comfort and cargo space, both of these items are competent sedans that perform well as daily drivers. Nevertheless, passengers in Mazda 3 might feel annoyed at the engine’s noise. Both the Mazda 3 and the Honda Civic RS Turbo make use of a front-wheel-drive layout. Under the Mazda 3’s hood is a 2.0-liter Skyactive-G inline-4 gasoline engine that produces 152 horsepower and 200 Nm of torque. On the other hand, Honda Civic RS Turbo makes 171 horsepower and 220 Nm of torque on the 1.5-liter turbo VTEC. For fuel consumption, the Honda Civic 2020 manages 9.5 km/l while the Mazda 3 is marginally better at around 10.5 km/L. Above is the brief of some features which both of the two models possess. To get full comparison in terms of specs as well as price, let’s come to Honda Civic vs Mazda 3!
  8. To uncover which is worth your budget to purchase as a family MPVs, here’s the comparison between the Mitsubishi Xpander vs Toyota Innova that is suggested on Philkotse! When it comes to dimension, the Xpander has a slightly longer wheelbase than the Innova, which results in a better ride and a more stable sense of speed. Stepping into the inside, the Toyota Innova 2020 is wider and taller, providing better legroom and headroom for eight passengers, which definitely surpasses the Xpander. As to the suspension setup, the Mitsubishi Xpander packs a torsion bar rear suspension for a softer and cushier ride, while the Innova J has a more versatile four-link suspension and a more robust suspension setup. The Innova has been an ideal choice as a family vehicle because its engine is regarded “indestructible” no matter whether gasoline or diesel. Thanks to the considerable torque as well as the durable suspension setup, the Innova possesses great off-roading ability. On the other hand, the Xpander 2020’s engine can produce 103 horsepower and 141 Nm of torque while the Innova is decidedly more powerful with 136 horses and 183 Nm of torque. However, Xpander achieves a better fuel economy at around 9.4 km/l in city driving whereas the Innova J returns around 7.7 km/l. As regards safety features, the Innova offers a knee airbag in addition to the dual front units, despite lacking an engine immobilizer which the Xpander possesses. The Xpander GLS Sport still has two front airbags, which is already far outpaced by the Innova 2.8 V's full complement of curtain, side and knee airbags. For more exhaustive details about price and specifications, let’s move on to Mitsubishi Xpander vs Toyota Innova comparison!
  9. In the Philippines, there is none more heated than the Camaro vs Mustang, and you must wonder which one deserves to be a better entry-level muscle car. If so, come and compare two models with Philkotse! In terms of styling, Ford Mustang holds a retro-modern beauty whereas the Chevrolet Camaro is revamped to take sporty modern looks with sleek lines and angular corners. As regards size, both are two-door coupes with limited space on the rear seat, but the Camaro is a bit smaller than the Mustang. When it comes to interior, both the Camaro and the Mustang provide front cabins that are well-laid out. Both of these vehicles comes furnished with leather seats, dashboard, center console, shift knob as well as similar on-board tech. A noteworthy point is that Ford’s SYNC 3 has some difficulty with Apple CarPlay while the improved Chevrolet's MyLink goes better. At 310 horsepower and 475 Nm of torque, the Mustang’s entry-level 2.3 L packs more power than the 2.0 Camaro's 275 horses and 398 Nm of pull. However, the Mustang achieves higher fuel efficiency than the Camaro. On handling, the Mustang seems difficult especially inexperienced drivers. Next, the Mustang appears to get superior power and safety features, along with a cheaper base variant and wider choice of trims. For extra information of specification comparison and price as well, visit directly Camaro vs Mustang on the website!
  10. If the so-called most dominant SUV in the country is Toyota Fortuner, the Nissan Terra seems a powerful and truck-based item offering certain features that the Fortuner doesn’t. Which is the better SUV? To answer that question, let’s get this Nissan Terra vs Fortuner comparison with Philkotse! As to size, the Nissan Terra is the wider and longer one, sharing the same height with the Fortuner and acquiring a higher ground clearance for better off-roading. In terms of styling, though both SUVs sport bold presence, the Fortuner looks much sleeker and modern in contrast with the Terra with more brusque aesthetics. When regarding seating, both SUVs can comfortably accommodate seven people on leather-clad seats. Particularly, the second-row seats on the Nissan Terra can be folded down with a simple push of a button for easily accessing the third row. Meanwhile, the top-spec Fortuner has ability to load large items. In terms of safety features, both the Toyota Fortuner and the Nissan Terra appear evenly matched, with a similar complement of airbags and ISOFIX anchors. Specifically, the Fortuner anti-lock brakes, traction control and trailer sway control. Meanwhile, the Nissan Terra 2020 appears with the Nissan Intelligent Mobility suite that includes hill start assist, hill descent control, and a lane departure warning system for greater off-road ability Above are some brief information of the two models, let’s gain more specific details about price and specifications right via the comparison the Nissan Terra vs Toyota Fortuner !
  11. Hello my name is Dennis and I work for a Bay Area Volkswagen Dealership. I got the deal that will make buying the Volkswagen e-Golf a no brainer. Right now if you contact me at 510-910-2237 or email me at duldennis0106@gmail.com. I will work out a $10000 off MSRP when financing on an in-stock 2019 e-golf vehicle. That's right, \you can own a fully electric car at that big discount if you call me today before the promo ends. Act fast before I sell out.
  12. In February 2018, Xinhua Finance and Economics (XHF), a subsidiary of Xinhua News Agency, published a list of the top 500 global market capitalization companies in 2017. It ranked the listed companies according to their market capitalization (market capitalization = unit stock price * number of shares issued, whichever is the closing data on December 31, 2017). According to the ranking, the top ten companies in the global automotive industry are Toyota Motor and Volkswagen Motor. China's SAIC Group ranks seventh with 57.53 billion US dollars, and the automotive companies from Japan, Germany and the United States, which are the traditional automotive powers, each occupy three seats. As a supplier of automotive parts in China, Feilongjiang Li is proud to learn that SAIC Group is among the top ten automotive companies with market capitalization in 2018.
  13. Volkswagen CEO Walter Disney said the company may have to accelerate its plans for mass production of electric vehicles to achieve stricter greenhouse gas reduction targets for European cars than expected. Recently, the European Union has agreed to cut car carbon dioxide emissions by 37.5% by 2030, which is stricter than the original EU proposal to reduce carbon dioxide emissions by 30%. EU negotiators also set an interim target of reducing carbon dioxide emissions from cars and trucks by 15% by 2025. Earlier, Germany had warned that stringent emission reduction targets could lead to job losses and damage the automotive industry. Germany is the largest automobile country in the European Union, with automobile output value of about 423 billion euros ($480 billion) in 2017. According to Disney, the 37.5% cut is more than 30% of Volkswagen's plan, so electric vehicle sales will account for more than 40% of Volkswagen's total sales by 2030 to meet emission requirements. As an electronic auto parts supplier, Chongqing Feilong Jiangli will keep up-to-date information on new technologies and new energy industries.
  14. According to data released by the European Association of Automobile Manufacturers (ACEA), registration of new cars in the European passenger car market fell 8.1% to 1,158,300 in November 2018, the third consecutive month of decline. Before the introduction of the new emission test (WLTP) in September, some automakers were eager to empty their inventories, which led to a 31.2% jump in vehicle registration in Europe in August. Since then, passenger car demand has begun to decline. Last month, the auto market continued to shrink in most European countries, including the five major markets. In the first 11 months of this year, the number of new car registrations in the European passenger car market increased by 0.8% to 14,585,417 over the same period last year. Central Europe is still the biggest driving force behind the growth of registrations. So far this year, the registrations of new cars in the region have increased by 9.6% year on year. Five major European markets showed different performances, including Spain (up 8% year-on-year), France (up 4.7%) and Germany (up 0.4% year-on-year). Italian market sales fell 3.5% year-on-year, while British market sales fell 6.9% year-on-year. As a component supplier, the decline of Asian brands has a direct impact on the sales performance of Feilongjiang Li. We look forward to the launch of new models and new technologies of various brands, which will enable the industry to recover slowly.
  15. According to foreign media reports, the Mirafiori plant of Fiat Chrysler Automobiles (FCA) in Turin has not been fully utilized. On Dec. 4, local time, the FCA told the union that it would temporarily lay off 3,245 blue-collar and white-collar workers, more than half of the total number of factory employees, due to the restructuring of the plant to produce electric vehicles. The Mirafio plant employs about 5,000 people, including workers in assembly, stamping and power assembly. The layoffs will affect all the workers in the assembly plant. About 2,445 workers will be laid off on January 1, 2019. More than 800 workers will be laid off before March 4, 2019. The layoffs will continue until December 31, 2019. On November 29, local time, the FCA said it planned to invest more than 5 billion euros ($5.7 billion) in new models and engines in Italy over the next three years in order to make better use of factories and improve employment and profits. In addition, employees will be trained in electric and hybrid power assembly technology. Starting from 2020, the plant will increase the production of Fiat 500 electric models. The plant currently produces only Maserati Levante, which will be continued by workers in shifts. During the layoffs, project workers will be paid lower, which is funded by the Italian government and employers.
  16. The R&D investment of automobile enterprises is competing: transforming "high-tech automobile enterprises"? Who is the most interesting? International market: Volkswagen is most willing to invest in R&D Let's first look at the global sector, which car company has the highest investment in R&D. According to the Global Innovation 1000 Survey recently released by PwC, the world's automotive industry invested 16 billion US dollars in R&D in 2018, up 15.2%, after a survey of R&D investment expenditure of 1,000 listed companies in the world in 2018, which is the third largest industry in R&D expenditure. Volkswagen is the most invested company in the world, investing 15.8 billion US dollars in R&D in 2018. PricewaterhouseCoopers points out that Volkswagen has invested heavily in artificial intelligence and vehicle networking this year, and it has announced that it will invest 34 billion euros in research and development of electric vehicles, automatic driving, automotive services and digitization by 2022. According to the analysis, Volkswagen's turnover last year was 230.7 billion euros, and R&D expenditure accounted for 5.7% of the turnover. In addition, the data show that the automobile companies behind Volkswagen in R&D investment include Toyota ($9.8 billion), Ford ($7.3 billion), General Motors ($8.1 billion), Daimler ($7.8 billion) and Honda ($6.5 billion). PricewaterhouseCoopers also pointed out that Chinese enterprises are paying more and more attention to R&D. In 2018, R&D investment expenditure grew the fastest, an increase of 34.4%. Domestic market: SAIC, BYD and Guangzhou Automobile are excellent students in R&D. What is the investment in R&D by Chinese auto companies? All-media reporters noticed that according to the specific R&D costs announced in the financial reports of major listed companies in the first half of this year, the three companies with the highest R&D costs were SAIC 6.165 billion yuan, BYD 3.719 billion yuan (including its business investment in electronics, mobile phone components) and Guangzhou Automobile Group 1.707 billion yuan. In addition, although Chang'an Automobile, Dongfeng Group and Huachen China did not disclose the specific costs of R&D expenditure in their financial reports, they all indicated that R&D investment increased compared with the previous year. Chang'an Automobile is also one of the high-tech research and development enterprises. As a supplier, Chongqing Feilong Jiangli will work together with Chang'an Automobile to innovate and develop new parts and models.
  17. On November 13, 2018, the unveiling ceremony of Chang'an Automobile Research Institute, President of Chang'an Automobile Research Institute, was solemnly held at Chang'an Suzuki No. 2 Factory, marking the further improvement of the independent research and development system of Chang'an Automobile and bringing greater impetus to the promotion of "the third innovation and entrepreneurship". From 1 yuan to buy all the shares of Changan SUZUKI, to integrate the independent R & D system. It can be seen that Chang'an Suzuki has not been negatively affected by Japan's withdrawal. On the contrary, after a short period of integration and adjustment, Chang'an Suzuki will usher in an all-round development stage in China. In Changan SUZUKI operation, "light assets". Asset-light, also known as the light assets operation mode, refers to the firm firmly grasping its core business. In light asset mode, the enterprise firmly grasped its core value. Light assets operation is a capital strategy driven by value, and it is a new structure of enterprise strategy under the background of network era and knowledge economy era. Changan SUZUKI's "excellence" advantage Despite the current domestic market consumption environment, it is difficult to subversion of small cars. But in terms of product quality and user experience, there is no need to doubt the superiority of Changan SUZUKI's "boutique".
  18. Stop Seat Belt Chime Only $20 EachIncludes FREE USA S&H http://www.bucklepup.tv Stop being treated like a child. After all, a smart driver is an adult and if able to drive a car, knows when to hookup a seat belt? <a href="http://www.bucklepup.tv">Order yours now</a> Yes! The Buckle Pup is Legal Worldwide A great feature, eliminates that bonging, gonging or buzzer sound, telling you to hookup, even if you only just want to run and warm up your car, back up into the driveway, work on car, run engine, stuck in slow city traffic, driving a big Pickup, Truck, SUV, Van in the city (not on the highway) etc. Unlike the old cars (what seat belts were designed for) the new cars of today crush you in the seat. Also time and again everyone keeps reading how, they would have saved the driver and passenger, if they could only find and release the seat belts. The new buckle pup cures that problem and more. Quick — Easy Find — Emergency Release With the buckle pup anyone can find, install and remove the seat belts, quickly with ease. 5 Stars based on 3466 user ratings Universal Fits 99% of all Vehicles Designed For Drivers - Who Believe They Should Be In Control Of There Own Car Leave in bottom buckle (no buzzer-gong) or let hang, for instant seat belt easy grab, hookup and emergency release Fits 99% of all vehicles, with these above two, being only sizes, it does not fit Smart to check your size before ordering The seat belt can also protect someone from being thrown about the cabin of a vehicle, potentially resulting in injury. But while the safety belt is very effective, it also carries the potential for serious injuries in the event of a high-speed crash. It is possible for the chest to be crushed or severely bruised. A crushed chest can have potentially fatal consequences, such as cardiac arrest or bruised lungs. It is also possible that the neck can be broken, resulting in paralysis or even death. NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) -- American car buyers have been shifting away from larger vehicles, fearing higher gas prices, but they are leaving themselves vulnerable in a crash, claims the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety.That's true even for small cars that get top crash-test ratings, the Institute said. In 23 USC 405 we read, “..the Secretary (of Transportation) shall make grants…to states that adopt and implement effective programs to reduce highway deaths and injuries resulting from individuals riding unrestrained or improperly restrained in motor vehicles”. As experts from the automobile industry warned, and as research has shown, restraints (seatbelts) increase, not decrease, the chance of an individual being killed or severely injured in an automobile accident. The implicit assumption contained in the statement, that highway deaths and injuries result from people not wearing seatbelts, is totally and demonstrably false. Yet that is the law of the land. In 23 USC 157 we read: “…(6) Savings to the federal government. The term “savings to the federal government” means the amount of Federal budget savings relating to federal medical costs (including savings under the medicare and medicaid programs under titles XIII and XIX of the Social Security Act (42 US 1395 et seq.), as determined by the secretary”. This pseudolegalistic nonsense was supposed to convince you that that forcing seatbelts on the public was going to save the Social Security System money! Apparently congress thought better of it, because they took this paragraph out in subsequent versions of the law. The case for seatbelts in automobiles was based on five false assumptions, something congress could easily have discovered before passing this legislation if they had bothered to ask the experts or, indeed, if they had merely listened to the experts, for the experts did try to tell them. They not only did not ask, they turned a deaf ear when they were told. As a result, thousands have died. The five false assumptions were these: 1. Most people who are killed in automobile accidents are killed in head-on collisions. In fact, according to the government’s own data, fewer than two percent of all collisions are head-on collisions and fewer than 14% of all fatal collisions are head-on collisions. 2. People are killed in head-on collisions by being thrown through the windshield. In fact, according to the latest available government data, of the 36,281 vehicle occupants who were killed in 2001 (the last year for which the government listed head-on collisions as a separate category) only 145 were “thrown through the windshield”. 3. Vehicle occupants would be saved if they were prevented from being thrown through the windshield by wearing a seatbelt. In fact, if the force on the occupant is sufficiently great to throw him through the windshield, the injury inflicted on the wearer by the seatbelt itself would be enough to kill him. 4. The passenger compartment is never stove in, in fatal collisions. In fact, the overwhelming majority of motorists who are killed in fatal collisions are killed by being crushed to death when the passenger compartment is stove in. The seatbelt acts like an anvil, holding the occupant in place as he is being crushed to death. 5. The seatbelt itself will not injure the wearer. In fact, in a head-on collision as low as 30 miles per hour with one foot of crush, the seatbelt will exert a force on the wearer of 30 times his body weight, i.e., enough to kill him. The fact that the seatbelt itself might injure the wearer never occurred to them. The seatbelt proponents had never heard of Newton's second law of motion! After motorists were first required to use seatbelts, reports began to come in from emergency rooms that people were being killed by seatbelts. Instead of heeding these reports and repealing the seatbelt laws, congress put forward the theory that it was merely a mistake in seatbelt design, and ordered the addition of shoulder belts to seatbelts. This resulted in an increase in seatbelt fatalities, as motorists were now being killed by their shoulder belts as well as by their lap belts. When it became clear that seatbelts were not effective in preventing fatalities in head-on collisions, NHTSA, in line with its continuing mandate to promote seatbelts, put forward the theory that they would prevent people from being killed in roll-overs. Quite apart from the fact that most people couldn’t roll their cars over if they tried, it turned out that most people who were killed in roll-overs were killed by being crushed when the roof caved in. The best chance of survival in such a case is to duck down, jump clear or be thrown clear, all of which are prevented by a seatbelt. The effect of seatbelts in roll-overs was thus to increase, not decrease, the number of fatalities. NHTSA then put forward the theory that seatbelts would save people from being killed by preventing them from being ejected. For a person to be ejected from a vehicle in an accident requires an unusual collision or roll-over of extreme violence, in which case the vehicle is usually so badly crushed that anyone trapped in the vehicle by a seatbelt would be almost sure to be killed. We know from actual accident reports that a person has a better chance of surviving such an accident if he is ejected than if he is trapped in the vehicle. There is nothing new or mysterious about this. Anyone who has seen an old western movie has probably seen the scene where two locomotives are about to collide. The engineer and the fireman do not fasten their seatbelts in such a case; they jump clear to save their lives. Yet locomotives are far more resistant to crush than automobiles. In line with the mandate of congress, NHTSA continues to lobby states to pass primary seatbelt laws. One of the ways they do this is to stage what we call “The Show” for state legislative committees considering seatbelt bills. How many of the cast show up at a particular hearing tends to vary from state to state and year to year. The cast usually consists of the head of the state police department, the head of the state department of transportation, the head of the public health department (or their subordinates), the local representative of MADD (a wholly owned subsidiary of NHTSA) a lady variously described as a “mother” or “home maker”, someone claiming to be the relative of an accident victim, and possibly one or two other people, variously described as a “child advocate” or “safety advocate”, all reading from a script supplied to them by NHTSA. The testimony is a clever mixture of false, misleading, emotional and irrelevant statements. Someone usually tells a tearful story about how a relative got killed in an automobile accident and therefore the legislature should force people to wear seatbelts. The hope is that this non-sequitur will not be questioned. You are supposed to jump to the conclusion that the relative would have been saved if he had been wearing a seatbelt, even though there is not a single verified case of a person's life ever being saved by a seatbelt in an automobile accident. <a href="http://www.bucklepup.tv">Stop seat belt chime alarm</a>
×
×
  • Create New...