Jump to content
CarForums

BMW 10-series?


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 67
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

They aren't that over priced - they are actually very well priced.

 

A top of the line diesel Ford Mondeo will cost you £29k and is no better than a £25k BMW 320d. In fact, the BMW is a much better car in every way.

 

Same story with Audi - you can get an A4 2.0 TDI 170 for £26k.

 

Seems a good deal to me!

 

Couple of things here,

1) We don't get the BMW 320, diesel or not. (closest BMW petrol, as we don't get any BMW diesels, is over $33,000)

2) We don't get the Ford Mondeo ( Not really sure which Ford is closest but the cheapest Fusion is $19,000 and the cheapest Taurus is $25,000)

3) We don't get the A4 TDI (the cheapest A4 gas model is $31,000)

 

The truth comes out!

 

Are you just finding this out :o

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Couple of things here,

1) We don't get the BMW 320, diesel or not. (closest BMW petrol, as we don't get any BMW diesels, is over $33,000)

2) We don't get the Ford Mondeo ( Not really sure which Ford is closest but the cheapest Fusion is $19,000 and the cheapest Taurus is $25,000)

3) We don't get the A4 TDI (the cheapest A4 gas model is $31,000)

 

 

 

Are you just finding this out :o

1) +1, when it comes to 3-series, the lower the model the better. More pure that way. Unless you were making another point...

2)What's your point, we do get the Taurus now so its all good.

3) +1 we get so screwed here on that, but I would still not buy it.

 

 

-I honestly thought you were in your 30s owning an X3 and for some retarded reason liked Chrysler. Now I know the retarded reason, lol.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The truth comes out!

 

HA! :lol:

 

Couple of things here,

1) We don't get the BMW 320, diesel or not. (closest BMW petrol, as we don't get any BMW diesels, is over $33,000)

2) We don't get the Ford Mondeo ( Not really sure which Ford is closest but the cheapest Fusion is $19,000 and the cheapest Taurus is $25,000)

3) We don't get the A4 TDI (the cheapest A4 gas model is $31,000)

 

 

 

Are you just finding this out :lol:

 

EDIT - that post directed towards Euro members. They may well be overpriced in the States.

 

-I honestly thought you were in your 30s owning an X3 and for some retarded reason liked Chrysler. Now I know the retarded reason, lol.

 

+1 :o

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1) +1, when it comes to 3-series, the lower the model the better. More pure that way. Unless you were making another point...

2)What's your point, we do get the Taurus now so its all good.

3) +1 we get so screwed here on that, but I would still not buy it.

 

 

-I honestly thought you were in your 30s owning an X3 and for some retarded reason liked Chrysler. Now I know the retarded reason, lol.

on 2 I was mentioning my lack of a price

 

Correction, I like jeep and Dodge :o Chrysler only has 1 good car at the moment

Link to comment
Share on other sites

on 2 I was mentioning my lack of a price

 

Correction, I like jeep and Dodge :o Chrysler only has 1 good car at the moment

-Ok

-And you do realize that Dodge and Jeep is American for Chrysler, right? And what good car does Chrysler make? Better question, what good car do Dodge and Jeep make?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

-Ok

-And you do realize that Dodge and Jeep is American for Chrysler, right? And what good car does Chrysler make? Better question, what good car do Dodge and Jeep make?

 

Alright, good vehicles made by chrysler llc :o

 

All the rams, the 300c, challenger, grand Cherokee, both models of the wrangler, the sprinter (:lol:), the journey is decent, and aside from gas mileage the Durango is pretty good

 

edit: and the viper :lol:

Edited by Shpuker
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Alright, good vehicles made by chrysler llc :(

 

All the rams, the 300c, challenger, grand Cherokee, both models of the wrangler, the sprinter (:lol:), the journey is decent, and aside from gas mileage the Durango is pretty good

 

edit: and the viper :lol:

Not all the rams were good and I would always get an F-series over one, the 300c is overrated, the Challenger is downright terrible, the grand Cherokee is just decent, the wrangler is ok as well, the sprinter is a mercedes, the journey is beatable, the durango is terrible.

 

Edit: Who has a Viper?

 

Because I honestly thought he was some bloke in his 30s that drove an X3!! :lol:

Want to hear something funny? I thought I was quoting him, not you, :lol:.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not all the rams were good and I would always get an F-series over one, the 300c is overrated, the Challenger is downright terrible, the grand Cherokee is just decent, the wrangler is ok as well, the sprinter is a mercedes, the journey is beatable, the durango is terrible.

 

Edit: Who has a Viper?

 

 

Want to hear something funny? I thought I was quoting him, not you, :lol:.

 

90% of the Rams 98' and newer are and were better than the Fords of the same year. Tough I must admit the 02-08 body style was a little odd for Dodge, but the Fords weren't much better looking and for a few years there had some pretty anoying electrical problems (randomly blown fuses that would just shut the truck off)

 

The 300C is a good car, yet almost everyone I've talked to trys to trash it... hardly overrated.

 

Whats so bad about the Challenger exactly? Its got a good engine, looks good, and sounds amazing. Handling is pretty bad but who needs that? :lol:

 

The Grand Cherokee is a good SUV. Sposedly its gona get better mileage the next few years aswell :lol:

 

So what?

 

The Journey is beatable but its not a bad try at a crossover

 

I like the Durango, big SUV with a beefy V8 that gets terrible gas mileage? Yes please :lol:

 

Dodge has it till 2011 I think, then its gone for a year till Fiat messes with it.... :( lets hope they make it better and don't screw it up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The 300c is crap. I know - I have driven several. Want a list of reasons, just ask.

 

I like the Challanger, but it needs a better gearbox and better cornering ablilities when cars like the GT500 exist.

 

The Grand Cherokee is crap. Interior is small for an SUV, drinks far too much, and drives badly. Yes it works off road (kind of), but the people who buy these cars don't use them off road. If it were my money and I was buying an SUV it would be an X5 or a Q7.

 

Don't know about the others, I will leave that to E_D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

90% of the Rams 98' and newer are and were better than the Fords of the same year. Tough I must admit the 02-08 body style was a little odd for Dodge, but the Fords weren't much better looking and for a few years there had some pretty anoying electrical problems (randomly blown fuses that would just shut the truck off)

 

The 300C is a good car, yet almost everyone I've talked to trys to trash it... hardly overrated.

 

Whats so bad about the Challenger exactly? Its got a good engine, looks good, and sounds amazing. Handling is pretty bad but who needs that? :lol:

 

The Grand Cherokee is a good SUV. Sposedly its gona get better mileage the next few years aswell :lol:

 

So what?

 

The Journey is beatable but its not a bad try at a crossover

 

I like the Durango, big SUV with a beefy V8 that gets terrible gas mileage? Yes please :lol:

 

Dodge has it till 2011 I think, then its gone for a year till Fiat messes with it.... :( lets hope they make it better and don't screw it up.

-Where are you getting this from? Home & Garden magazine??

-No it's ridiculously overrated. No manual avail, crappy V8 that drinks like a whore. Crappy interior. Ugly. Charger exists

-425/425 from a 6.1L Hemi? That's good? Seriously? Interior is crappy, it's made by Chrysler so you know it will break, and Mustang's and Camaro's handle, period. Did I forget to mention that the Mustang exists?? Oh yeah, and the Mustang exists. And the Camaro. And the Audi A4 2.7 TDI wagon. And the Kia Rondo. And the Mibotsu Thunderrrrrrr.

-Ok, if I had to get a Chrysler, the Cherokee IS the only one I would have. BUT. I still think it's garbage in every aspect save looks, which don't mean much according to my laws of physics.

-Ok it's not a Kia, but like Journey, Ford Edge, Journey, GMC Acadia, Journey, VW Tiguan, Journey, Kia Rondo (yes I know what I said at the beginning of this sentance), Journey, RAV4, Journey, Toyota Venza, Hyundai Santa Fee, Mazda Tribute. What was that first one again?

-Durango, hideous piece of shit that gets you there tomorrow, with a destroyed spine, blind by how bad the interior looks, senseless by how bad the interior feels, and shortened by how little space there is that still achieves -124 MPG? Count me in!

-Chrysler recovering within a year would be like the beginning of a supernova ending within 5 seconds.

 

If it were my money and I was buying an SUV it would be an X5 or a Q7.

This is why you aren't my friend.

Edited by Elite_Deforce
Link to comment
Share on other sites

-Where are you getting this from? Home & Garden magazine??

-No it's ridiculously overrated. No manual avail, crappy V8 that drinks like a whore. Crappy interior. Ugly. Charger exists

-425/425 from a 6.1L Hemi? That's good? Seriously? Interior is crappy, it's made by Chrysler so you know it will break, and Mustang's and Camaro's handle, period. Did I forget to mention that the Mustang exists?? Oh yeah, and the Mustang exists. And the Camaro. And the Audi A4 2.7 TDI wagon. And the Kia Rondo. And the Mibotsu Thunderrrrrrr.

-Ok, if I had to get a Chrysler, the Cherokee IS the only one I would have. BUT. I still think it's garbage in every aspect save looks, which don't mean much according to my laws of physics.

-Ok it's not a Kia, but like Journey, Ford Edge, Journey, GMC Acadia, Journey, VW Tiguan, Journey, Kia Rondo (yes I know what I said at the beginning of this sentance), Journey, RAV4, Journey, Toyota Venza, Hyundai Santa Fee, Mazda Tribute. What was that first one again?

-Durango, hideous piece of shit that gets you there tomorrow, with a destroyed spine, blind by how bad the interior looks, senseless by how bad the interior feels, and shortened by how little space there is that still achieves -124 MPG? Count me in!

-Chrysler recovering within a year would be like the beginning of a supernova ending within 5 seconds.

 

 

This is why you aren't my friend.

- From personal experience with both...

- Looks are subjective, I like how it looks

- This is interesting--> http://www.nextautos.com/dodge-challenger-...g-sales-numbers .

http://www.challengerblog.com/blog/1019453...ebruary-of-2009

Couldn't find the mustang sales but insert that # here :lol: lol

- Beats the Explorer in gas mileage :lol: not a big feat but yay. I like it though, their really good in the snow so their really popular here.

-I like the way it looks but its kind of a no purpose SUV. Tis why I like it :lol:

- I think its more of a, Fiat is gona try to make it faster :(.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

×
×
  • Create New...